Little Women, Inner Children

Yesterday we taped the first episode of Talking Pictures since my back went kablooey (and yes that’s the official medical diagnosis). To celebrate I got it into my head to decorate my head, and so into my triple-braided bun wove pine cones and branches, baby’s breath, and tiny birds, an effect that raised more than a few eyebrows among the normally unflappable population of NYC. Chalk it up to the fact that I was reviewing the most recent iteration of Little Women, which I had approached with great trepidation and from which I had floated with great elation.

There have many, many film, television, and stage adaptations of Louisa May Alcott’s Civil War-set saga about four Massachusetts sisters who are rich in love and poor in cash–it’s a YA novel with which I’m plainly obsessed–but this is the most ravishing and the first that does not betray the intense feminism of its author. Directed by mumblemouth millennial Greta Gerwig (cue my trepidation), it boasts an intensely good cast including Soirse Ronan as stalwart Jo, Meryl Streep putting her mugging to good use for a change as drolly disapproving Aunt March, Timotheeee Chalomet very right (if too slight) as Laurie, and Florence Pugh, channeling the authentically big emotions of her Midsommar character to animate Amy, the most bedazzled and entitled of the March girls. (Laura Dern is too Modern Millie for the Marnie of my dreams, but I’ve always been immune to her Lynchian charms.)

Make no mistake. This adaption is beautifully plated and well-heeled –the cinematography, costume, and production design as painterly as an Ivory-Merchant–but far less conventional than its predecessors. These little women live unsequentially, for example, which neatly solves the problem of how to tuck their many chapters into two hours. And sly nods abound to the compromises Alcott was willing to make for her characters but not herself. Not for nothing does Jo say what Alcott often did–“I’d rather be a free spinster rowing her own canoe”–though it’s a line the author never dared grant her stand-in, since selling her family’s story required filing down its edges. The ending frames this fact brilliantly ambiguously: An array of happy tableaus —all amber waves of grain and golden rays of light and every Jill with her Jack—haunted by a final spectre of Jo sola at the printers, clutching a volume of Little Women for dear life and in decidedly darker light. Thus the book’s warmth and wit is captured along with Alcott’s underlying message that a traditional happy ending for women has always precluded economic and creative freedom.

So, so good that I responded with the ecstasy rather than anxiety of influence that great art always inspires in me. (Sorry, Harold Bloom). Since I was a little girl, it’s been Star Wars double buns, Mrs Whatsit chic, Anna Karenina furs–a form of flattery, you could argue, the March girls would have practiced had they traipsed into the 20th century. So to present the film on-air I adorned myself with cameo, high collar, long skirt, transcendentally trimmed hair. All that was missing was a clothespin on my nose.

And wouldn’t you know the boys– with the exception of me, this episode’s panel was purely cistraightwhitemale–were so busy talking over each other that they barely found the time to manterrupt me, let alone register my Amy adornments? Christopher Columbus, I don’t give a fig. I’m reasonably sure the little women who most need my talking points will receive them.

Anyway I’ve yet to hear of a canoe propelled by the male gaze, though inner children will always be welcome aboard.

"All, everything I understand, I understand only because I love."
― Leo Tolstoy